Q: (L) If you are now in a particular universe that has been created and merged by 4th density STS, and there is still the old universe existing, can you feel a connection, or a bridging, because some alternate self is in that alternate universe, living through some experience… or a similar thing?
A: No limits of possibilities.
Q: (L) So it can be any and all of those things, and bridging realities of “past” and “future,” as well. Is it possible to change the past within a particular, selected one of the universes; can you go back in time, within that universe, change the past, and have it change everything forward, still within that selected universe, like a domino effect?
A: In such a case, yes.
Q: (L) But, you said that if you want to change the past, you have to create an alternate universe… (T) No, you asked about changing the past, and they said you have to create a temporary place to work from, a position from which you can manipulate the reality…
A: That is for specialized activities such as abductions.
Q: (L) So that creating of an alternate universe was for special things, and not for a general historic change?
A: What was described is not the same as an “alternate universe.”
Q: (L) It is like a temporary file that will go away when you are finished loading the program. And that is not creating an alternate universe, but rather a temporary dimension…
A: Close. Q: (L) In our particular universe, what is the primary mode? Are we constantly shifting and merging universe to universe, or is our past being changed and reacting like the domino effect… at least in the past few years… Is it that any and all possibilities and will and do take place?
A: Closer.
Q: (L) Can you clarify that any further for me?
A: No, because you would simply not grasp it.
Q: (T) It is part of the infrastructure of the universe which we are in no way capable of understanding at this point. We can’t even get quarks right.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Are the words “universe” and “dimension” synonymous?
A: Yes and no.
Q: (L) In what sense yes?
A: For you, these are “grey” areas, and no matter how hard you try, until your perception shifts fundamentally, you ain’t gonna get it!
Keeping all of this in mind, let us now turn our attention to the Cassiopaean description of the abduction process. The question and answer format will be adhered to for the sake of clarity.
Q: (L) A couple of nights ago I did a hypnosis session with J___ to examine the events that took place on August 16, 1993, over my pool, wherein two 300 ft wide black boomerangs were seen by all of us, kind of casually drifting by. In this hypnosis session, after two or three passes through the events, he indicated that, in fact, that was not merely a sighting of something going overhead, but was actually an abduction situation. Would that be correct?
A: What do you think? The reason we ask this is, again we must reiterate, your learning is to be more and more accomplished by utilizing the tools you have within you, and, we are happy to see that you are, indeed, doing this. But you must trust in your own ability to access the information you need through your own efforts.
Q: (L) One remark he made during this session, and this startled me a little, and I would like to get a little amplification on the subject, was that toward the end when I asked what happened, he said that he was “taken apart and beamed back down without benefit of a pain suppressor.” This meant that when he was demolecularized some sort of device that is used to suppress pain was not used, and the process of atomic demolecularization or remolecularization can actually be painful, and can cause distress. Is this correct?
A: Possibly. The whole process of abduction can be stressful, but, to varying degrees and, of course, we must remind you that, as with everything else, it is your own perception of reality that is the most important factor, not some notion of your own perception of reality.
Q: (L) I don’t understand what you mean. Is there some device that… does it hurt to be taken to pieces molecularly, beamed aboard a space ship and then sent back. (J) Can this be painful to the body?
A: Well, first of all, you are getting way ahead of yourself. Do you honestly believe that a beam of light came down and “took you to pieces,” moved your body physically onboard a space vehicle, did some form of examination or some such thing and then reassembled your entire body without a pain suppressor? Is this what you believe?
Q: (L) Well, he didn’t say it happened to me, he said it happened to him. (J) We have never heard the term “Pain suppressor” before. (L) Yes, we have never heard anything about anything like this; and do I believe a beam of light could have come down and disassembled him and reassembled him, and then something was done to him. From all the abduction cases I have studied I would say it is possible. I mean, knowing about the time manipulation capabilities of said entities, it is entirely possible that it could have happened without any awareness of any loss of time whatsoever.
A: Yes, this is true, however, your description of it is not completely correct as referenced in the hypnosis session you speak of, or at least your interpretation of the information given during the hypnosis session given is not correct. Now, it must be noted here, that when we make such clarifying statements such as “this is not correct” or “that is not correct,” it is unusual for us to do this because the nature of your state of being and all others is one involving various degrees of bonded illusion. Therefore any and all possibilities are present in most instances. However, when two or more of these bonds of the illusion are misaligned, then, indeed, absolute correctness or absolute incorrectness is possible. In this case, there is a misalignment of the bonding. Therefore, it is, in fact, completely incorrect. We will now describe the process in more detail.. This knowledge is very important not only for what, perhaps, has happened in your reality as you would refer to it as your past, but also in possible variations of your present and in what you refer to as your future. These experiences must be known in their entirety as to what they really are.
You are not normally removed as a physical third density being from one locator to another. What happens is very simple. The time frame is normally frozen, and we use the term “frozen” for lack of a better term. What this means is that your perception of time in your physical locator, third density body, ceases to pass during this period of time that is called “zero time” variously by members of your human race. What happens is that the soul imprint occupying of that particular host body is removed forcibly, transported to another locator, and remolecularized as a separate physical entity body for purpose of examination, implantation, and other. The soul imprint is used for the purpose of duplication process; it is then demolecularized and the soul imprint is replaced in the original body at the original locator. That is the process that takes place.
Cassiopaea.org
Copyright © 1997-1999 Cassiopaea org. All rights reserved.