AC: Absolutely.
KC: What I’d like to know is whether or not you are familiar with the Philadelphia Experiment and how you sort of figure that out in terms of what you are talking about. How do you correlate that?
AC: Well I think…I mean, I loved the story of the Philadelphia Experiment. I read Charles Berlitz’s book and was it, William Moore, I believe, was the other co-author. I’ve read about it in notebooks previously.
The main person who spilled the beans on it was a guy called Carlos Allende and he told the story to a UFO writer by the name of Morris K Jessop and it’s a famous story. I mean, there is a lot of evidence to suggest that it didn’t happen, I’m afraid.
Recently a claimed survivor of the vessel, the USS Eldridge, came forward and said: “Yes, I was there, I saw it all.” But countering that is the fact that the members of the crew of the USS Eldridge actually have a yearly get-together and they laugh and joke about the whole Philadelphia experiment saying: “It was far more interesting than what we remember.”
So, it’s the case, the verdict is out whether this actually took place. But what I can say is that the story that I’ve told you about The Mohican was almost certainly the forerunner of the Philadelphia experiment.
In fact, some researchers have actually suggested that the whole idea was based on the story of The Mohican from 1904 which I find really fascinating because here you’ve got almost the same thing going on and I understand from researchers that there may have been even more to this case than was published at the time in newspapers. So even if the Philadelphia experiment turns out to have been a hoax it was possibly based on a very real incident that occurred in 1904.
KC: OK, Well are you familiar with the Montauk experiments?
AC: Of course.
KC:…and, we have, there are so many witnesses that are talking about this and the idea is also, has to do with, what progress has been made from there on in regard to what you might call time travel or dealing with shifting timelines and all of this is cutting edge research that’s being done at this time.
AC: My honest answer to that is that I have absolutely no idea whether the Montauk story is real or not. I’d love to think it was. Maybe parts of it’s a hoax, maybe some of it’s real. I don’t know. All I can say is that it comes back to what I was said earlier about making up your own reality.
And I’ll say that flippantly, but what I mean by that is that what we buy into, I believe that we can find evidence for and it becomes real. Which is why skeptics exist. I mean, skeptics will basically find evidence to disprove whatever. Of course they will. Whereas those that believe will always find evidence for that theory or idea or story or whatever that has gone on. Which is right, they’re both right because as I said, reality is essentially as you make it. It’s not all the same. There’s not just one reality. I believe we all create our own reality.
We’re all like cogs in this great system that probably exists beyond space/time and most people assume that those cogs all interlink and all run together, you know, they’re all linked at different speeds but basically… What if the cogs are not connected? What if those cogs that are turning are not actually connected? I mean, this is a possiblility. I think that we need to start looking at reality in a different way.
What I see through my eyes, what the viewers see through their eyes, what they’re viewing now as they look at this interview, that’s their personal reality and that’s something which I think that they can influence. Some people are going to reject what I say, some people are going to think these are great, cool ideas. But hey, that’s what life’s about, I think.
KC: OK. But there’s still a problem in terms of the fact that we have physical entities entering this reality that are not human.
AC: Yeah, I’ve no problem with that.
KC:…and has nothing to do with whether you believe in them or not,
AC: Yes.
KC:…they still exist independent of your belief.
AC: Yes, but the thing is that, as I said, that doesn’t mean that if my reality can’t impinge on other people, you know. I’ve just given a lecture about Gobekli Tepe, the oldest temple in the world. I’ve imposed my ideas on an audience of hundreds. Now those people will go away and check it and some will validate what I said and some will say: “I think you’re wrong.” But I’ve just imposed my reality on other people and if people take that in and allow it to become part of their reality then it’s real, you know? I mean I think that that’s the way things exist. We influence the past, we influence the future, all of these influence us. Who knows what’s influencing us at this very moment for the future maybe.
KC: Well, that I will agree with. But what I’m wondering is where you draw the line because there is this independent cogs issue, as you were saying, maybe in 3D they appear independent but as you leave this 3D reality, this level of reality there’s no doubt whatsoever that there is a linkup, that eventually whether you believe in God or whatever you want to call it, there’s a leader or there’s a source which is probably the best word for it, that it all ultimately comes from.
And so there is a linkup anyway above this reality so that things like, for example, the tsunami that just happened in Japan, this is happening on this planet to … it also washed in on…I mean, it was threatening my house in theory on the Pacific coast, it didn’t get that far but it did get to Santa Cruz harbor and was impacting some of the ships in the harbor there. In other words, this is very real. This is a linked reality, we’re experiencing it simultaneously.