Category: Abduction Experience Classification

[Class M] (Modern)-These humans are working on the same cooperative level as Class A. They were taken from the Earth in modern times. During some abduction projects, twins (either identical or fraternal) are induced in a female subject. During the first trimester, one of the fetuses is removed. It is then grown to maturity by Group A. Abductees will meet their twins during some abductions. Very limited contact has been made by these humans. [GROUP C] GENETICALLY MODIFIED EARTH BORN HUMANS These humans are comprised of two classes and should not be confused with Group D Greys. [Class W] (Workers)-This class is the smallest in physical stature. They are described as approximately three and a half feet in height, large head, and eyes, pale […] Read More

They came to the Earth sometime before 50,000 BC. for mining and colonization purposes. Note: an excellent source of information is the Earth Chronicles, by Zachariah Sitchin. These advanced humans modified an existing, Earthborn, pre-human by merging their genes with it. The resultant hybrid is what we now call modern man, us. The remaining subgroups of humans observed onboard UFO’s are all Earthborn humans who were taken from the Earth both in ancient and modern times. All of these human beings can be found in our historical literature, described in various ways. In very ancient times they were called Gods. Some of the later names are angels, devas, fairies, elves, demons, incubus and succubus, etc. It is interesting to note that as mankind developed […] Read More

I believe that this is the very same technique used by the Grays in abductions. The similarities are overwhelming. Every abductee says that when they are abducted they are paralyzed and become mentally disorientated. This is usually in the presence of a gray. The most striking thing they recall is what is called the “Stare”. This is when the gray looks directly at an abductee. The large dark eyes capture the abductee’s attention immediately. They then report being unable to move and a feeling of great mental disorientation. On some rare occasions, abductees report a lessening of these effects when the gray looked away from them. This clearly indicates that the intensity of the effect was directly proportional to the direction or focus of […] Read More

The following is an article that was published in the HUFON Journal, 1992. Debunking versus Counterintelligence: Reflections of a Pro-ufologist by Richard D. Butler To the pro-ufologist, debunking and counterintelligence (CI) efforts are seen as the greatest hindrances to legitimate research. The two terms are frequently used as synonyms. In fact, they are two very distinct operations. Debunking has two sources: the U.S. government and civilians. The civilian debunkers are usually professional academics, whose motivation is principally reactionary protection against a challenge to their world view. They see UFOs, and belief in UFOs and even organized study of UFOs as a threat to their own reality system. The protective strategy is, in psychological terms, the well-known process called “denial.” We see it in alcoholics, […] Read More

(1) Denial to ufologists of the government’s offensive and defensive weapons capabilities; (2) Denial to ufologists of the government’s intelligence-gathering capabilities and level of analysis; and (3) Prevention of direct or indirect Psychological Warfare effect. Are these measures justifiable? In the balance are our rights as U.S. citizens versus the degradation of America’s national security caused by the release of the UFO information. With this in mind, let’s review the three criteria in detail. Item (1) is fairly obvious. If a potential enemy learns our weapons technology, he can develop countermeasures. This, in turn, would render the weapons system useless, and make us vulnerable to attack. So the answer is a clear and resounding “No!” to release. Item (2) is the reverse side of […] Read More