On occasion, the fourth-density beings doing the abduction can actually make a mistake in the time referencing points of the third-density illusion. This may create the effect of the appearance of an alternate or duplicate experience, when, in actuality, there has only been one experience. This was what happened in your case. As you perceived the passage of two “ships” for lack of a better term when in actuality, there was only one. That is because the time frame reference illusion was not completely matched from the beginning of event to the end of the event at zero time. Normally, however, that is not a problem. On rare occasions, the host, or the subject of the abduction can actually find themselves replaced in the […] Read More
Category: Abduction Writers
Q: (L) If you are now in a particular universe that has been created and merged by 4th density STS, and there is still the old universe existing, can you feel a connection, or a bridging, because some alternate self is in that alternate universe, living through some experience… or a similar thing? A: No limits of possibilities. Q: (L) So it can be any and all of those things, and bridging realities of “past” and “future,” as well. Is it possible to change the past within a particular, selected one of the universes; can you go back in time, within that universe, change the past, and have it change everything forward, still within that selected universe, like a domino effect? A: In such […] Read More
Don Juan dealt with all of this in a very pragmatic way. He said that “we have a companion for life. We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. The predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. If we want to act independently, it demands that we don’t do so.” (Castaneda, 1998, p. 218) And, I would like to add, that the predator gives us clever psychologies and philosophies that attempt to explain the mysteries of our world so that we live under the illusion that we have a clue about what is […] Read More
Through all of his travels and researches, Jung discovered that the images of the hero, the twin brothers, the sun, the eternal feminine, the underground journey, the serpent, the mandala of wholeness, and the dynamism of opposites occurred again and again. Jung’s conclusion was compelling, that the unconscious mind had a collective level that is common to all of humankind. The deeper levels of mind are OBJECTIVE, for they belong to the entire human race. The personal nature of mind had now been shown to contain an objective, impersonal level. In the same way, a sort of “reverse” operation was occurring in science. For centuries the study of physics had been the objective study of nature. But, with the advent of quantum theory, it […] Read More
Linearity encourages an attitude of mind in which a complex system is analyzed into simpler systems. This is because a linear system can always be broken down into a collection of coupled linear differential equations that correspond to interacting elements. For example, the conduction of heat and sound in a metal can be described in terms of interacting abstractions called phonons. In the linear region, a metal behaves as if it were composed of elementary phonons – just as atoms act as if they are composed of elementary particles. But, as the temperature of the metal is raised, or if it is perturbed more violently in other ways, nonlinear behavior dominates and it is no longer possible to explain its properties in terms of […] Read More
Going back to Castaneda for a moment, and keeping in mind these strange creatures described by Michael Harner, we find don Juan and Carlos out in the desert one day: “…I really wanted to start for home right away […] but before we reached his house, don Juan sat down on a high ledge overlooking the valley. He didn’t say anything for awhile. He was not out of breath. I couldn’t conceive of why he had stopped to sit down. “‘The task of the day, for you, ‘ he said abruptly, in a foreboding tone, ‘is one of the most mysterious things of sorcery, something that goes beyond language, beyond explanations. …So brace yourself by propping your back against this rock wall, as far […] Read More
“I felt that my head was shaking violently from side to side. I could not express my profound sense of unease and discontentment, but my body moved to bring it to the surface. I shook from head to toe without any volition on my part. “‘No, no, no, no,’ I heard myself saying. ‘This is absurd, don Juan. What your saying is something monstrous. It simply can’t be true, for sorcerers or for average men, or for anyone.’ “‘Why not?’ don Juan asked calmly. ‘Why not? Because it infuriates you?’ “‘Yes, it infuriates me,’ I retorted. ‘Those claims are monstrous!’ […] “‘I want to appeal to your analytical mind, ‘ don Juan said. ‘Think for a moment, and tell me how you would explain […] Read More
A: Yes. Q: And now you talk about perception bonding. A: Yes. Now, try to picture how gravity is the binder of all reality!!! Q: (L) If gravity is the binder, is gravity consciousness? A: Not exactly. Did you know that there is no “right” or “left” in 4th density through 7th density? If you can picture this exactly, then you may be able to understand the responses to all the questions you are asking. If not, best “give it a rest.” Because it will only be productive learning when you ponder and reflect/review “later.” Q: (L) Is gravity something from the center of dimensional windows to an opposite “construct” in the ethereal realm, rather than the attraction between objects in this material realm? […] Read More
A: You experienced a bleedthrough of 4th density. Q: (T) When you started to explain about the trance state, you said: “What I call zoned out, I can’t explain it.” That’s the same thing the Cassiopaeans say when we ask them to explain what 4th density is like! (J) Yes, we have no physical frame of reference. (L) Yes, I can’t say I wasn’t unaware, because I was intensely aware of everything. And yet, I can’t say I was focused on any one thing, because I’m not. (F) The last session we had we received some clues as to why it is they can’t explain all these things. They said something when we were talking about plants and rocks at 1st density. Try to […] Read More
The world of our cognition seems to rest on the interpretation of data we receive from our five senses. We consider solid things to be “solid,” yet it is clear to those who study physics that everything that exists is subject to many and varied interpretations. Since the contact with the Cassiopaeans began, I have been urged by them to study as many systems of knowledge as I can reasonably cram into a busy life. I have found numerous correspondences to the Cassiopaean comments on the various levels of reality in other words, most notably that of the Sufi Shaykh, Ibn Al-‘Arabi and the teachings of various Shamanic paths including that explicated by Don Juan and recorded by Carlos Castaneda. I have also found […] Read More
Now, going back to the idea of the three physical realms and the three ethereal realms which balance each other, with the intermediate realm of 4th density where physicality is “variable and selective,” we have to consider the concept of realms of pure consciousness. Many scientists have discussed the idea of “aether” as the means by which material things are in contact with one another so that the evidence of “non-local” events could be explained in pseudo-material terms. The “Aether” is conceptualized as “a little bit more than a vacuum” or a “vacuum that can vibrate.” Einstein rejected the idea of “aether” on the basis of Occam’s Razor as an “unnecessary” hypothesis. Dirac, later on, revisited the concept and tried to revive it in […] Read More
1. A relationship between sleep anomalies and the abduction experience seems to make sense on theoretical grounds (and in terms of the extent of sleep anomalies in the general population) but is yet to be directly evaluated. 2. The consistency across abduction narratives is obvious, but its statistical deviation from chance (as determined by narrative production for the general population) has not been assessed. In fact, despite the existence of some frequency distribution tables for abduction experience characteristics and content (e.g., Bullard, 1994), statistical analyses of these data have not been done. Also, a much closer examination of cultural variations in the abduction experience needs to be done. 3. The occurrence of certain stigmata (e.g., scoop marks) have been described as suspicious, but no […] Read More
DISCUSSION Facts acquire significance only when related to theory, and theory remains empty in the absence of supporting fact. For fact and theory to be of any relevance, a relationship between them must be established. This is especially important, and especially difficult, when dealing with a phenomenon such as the abduction experience. As Morrison (1972) has stated: If we are to believe any hypothesis, however plausible or implausible, concerning new events — particularly those that do not satisfy the easy quality of being reproducible at will by those who undertake to set up a laboratory for the purpose — then we must find … multiple, independent chains of evidence satisfying a link-by-link test. [p. 280] Mindful of this, what can be said of the […] Read More
Clearly then, a researcher’s or clinician’s intuitive sense about a child’s testimony (let alone the intuitive sense of the child’s parents) says nothing about the validity of that testimony. And the testimony’s detail, coherence, or consistency with adult testimony, is of significance only in regard to the child’s opportunity for misattribution. As difficult as it may be to document such influence, a child’s exposure to books, movies, television, the media, and the casual conversations of parents, peers, teachers, and the occasional stranger, provide more than ample opportunity for misattribution to occur. Parental assurance that their child had no opportunity for exposure to such influences is naive, or at best unfalsifiable. In addition, a perhaps counterintuitive finding from recent research (Brainerd, Reyna, & Brandse, 1995) […] Read More