A: Yes.
Q: (TM) Do they want to… (J) No they are happy there… they want to stay there forever and control, and consume, and have a good time. (BP) It is like finding a place with really good food, a great place to live, great sex, everything you like, you would want to stay there. (TM) Don’t a lot of us like the idea of staying in the 3rd level forever?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Now, we want to know if there is any correlation between the movement of UFOs and weather patterns… (J) Specifically, thunderstorms.
A: Correlation?
Q: (L) Okay, can UFOs not fly during thunderstorms or electrical storms?
A: Incorrect.
Q: (L) Okay, they can fly during thunderstorms?
A: Yes. But “fly” is an improper term.
Q: (L) Okay, what do they do during thunderstorms if they don’t fly?
A: Operate.
Q: (T) Well, the real question is: does the thunderstorm interfere in the EM flow between densities?
A: Can.
Q: (L) Can thunderstorms interfere with their projection ability?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Do thunderstorms or electrical activity inhibit them?
A: Ionization.
Q: (T) Is the fact that there are very few abduction cases, at least I read about, and I’ve read quite a few of them, during thunderstorms, have to do with the thunderstorm interfering with the EM, so that the abduction would be much harder to do, therefore they don’t bother doing it?
A: No.
Q: (T) Can abductions take place during thunderstorms?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is there a possibility that thunderstorms possibly enhance this activity?
A: No.
Q: (T) So third density EM disturbances don’t disturb fourth density?
A: Can.
Q: (J) Can they control it. (T) Well, I haven’t read very many things about abductions during storms. (L) Well, I have read about a few, enough to break it as a rule. (T) Is there some reason that it isn’t happening as often during thunderstorms? (J) They don’t want to get wet.
A: Can you drive a car during the rain?
Q: (J) Yes, but if it is raining really hard, you avoid it. (L) Is there any particular reason why more abductions and UFO sightings occur at night?
A: Not correct.
Q: (L) So, you mean there is as much activity in the daytime as there is at night?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, that blew that theory.
Q: (L) Was there a harmonic convergence as was advertised within the metaphysical community?
A: For those who believed there was a harmonic convergence, indeed there was a harmonic convergence.
Q: (L) Did anything of a material nature happen on or to the planet to enhance or change the energy?
A: Did you notice any changes?
Q: (L) No. Except that it seems that things have gotten worse, if anything.
A: Did you notice any clear, obvious, material changes?
Q: (L) No. But that could just be me. I could just be a stubborn and skeptical person.
A: Did anyone else in the room notice any clear or obvious changes?
Q: (S) What date was it? (L) 8/8/88, I believe. (S) I thought it had something to do with 11/11 ninety- something…
A: Well, obviously if the recollection of the calendar date was difficult, one would suppose that material changes did not take place. For, if they had, would you not remember the calendar date ascribed to them?
Q: (L) Yes. The claim has further been made that, for a month, following the harmonic convergence that no abductions were taking place. Is this true?
A: No. There has been no cessation in what you term to be abduction in quite some time as you measure it.
Q: (L) Well, on the subject of abduction: we watched a film on television, Monday the 28th, that was a purported video of an alien autopsy, or, more correctly, an autopsy on an alien body. Was this, in fact, an alien?
A: How do you define “alien?”
Q: (L) Was it a being other than a naturally born human on this planet as we know human beings?
A: That is correct.
Q: (L) It was other than a naturally born human?
A: Correct.
Q: (L) Okay. What kind of a being was this?
A: Hybrid.
Q: (L) What was it a hybrid of – combining what elements?
A: Cybergenetic creatures you refer to as “Grays,” and earth human such as yourself, third density. So, in essence, it was a hybridization of a 3rd density and 4th density being.
Q: (L) Okay, was this a 4th density being.
A: No. If you listen to the response – it was a 3rd and 4th density being.
Q: (L) How can a being be both 3rd and 4th density?
A: It is the environmental surroundings that count, not the structure of the individual. The same is true, for you. After all, you have read literature stating that your world or planet is in the process of ascending from 3rd to 4th density, have you not? [See “The Ra Material]
Q: (L) Yes.
A: And this literature has also stated that this is an ongoing process, has it not?
Q: (L) Yes.
A: Then, one must wonder, if it is an ongoing process, how would it be possible, if it is not possible, for a being to be in both 3rd and 4th density at one time… Also, if you will recall from review material, you are currently living in the same environment as 2nd and 1st density level beings. Is this not true?
Q: (L) Yes.
Part 8d
Copyright © 1997-1999 Cassiopaea org. All rights reserved.